Thạc Sĩ Using the analytic hierarchy process approach for assessment of the strength of university-industry-

Table of Contents


Chapter Title Page


Title page i
Acknowledgement ii
Abstract iii
Table of Contents iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
List of Acronyms viii
List of Appendix ix
1. Introduction and Problem Description
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Problem Statement 1
1.3 Objectives of the Study 2
1.4 Scope and Limitations of the Study 2
1.5 Organization of Report and Research Design 3
2. Literature Review
2.1 General 5
2.2 Linkage Types 6
2.3 Facilitators and Inhibitors to Linkages 9
2.4 The Analytic Hierarchy Process 14
3. Research Methodology and Framework
3.1 General 16
3.2 AHP Model Formulation 16
3.3 The AHP Model for Overall Linkage 17
3.4 The AHP Model for Individual Linkage 18
3.5 Model Application, Processing and Reporting 22
4. University-Industry-GRI Partnership in Vietnam
4.1 Overview 25
4.2 The Reformation of Research and Development in Vietnam 26
4.3 University-Industry-GRI Partnership Prior to 1988 27
4.4 University-Industry-GRI Partnership since 1988 29
4.5 Existing Difficulties in R&D System of Vietnam 30
5. Data Collection and Processing
5.1 General 32
5.2 Data collection method and source 32
5.3 Data Processing 36
6. Analysis of Results
6.1 General 39
6.2 The Overall Linkage: University-Industry-GRI 39
6.3 Linkage between Food Industry and University 45
6.4 Linkage between University and GRI 50
6.5 Linkage between GRI and Industry 54
7. Conclusions and Recommendations
7.1 General 59
7.2 Conclusions 59
7.3 Recommendations 60
7.4 Further Research Direction 61
References 62
Appendix 66




List of Figures



Figure No.


Title
Page​ 1.1
Research design
4​ 2.1
The Innovation Triangle
5​ 3.1
Hierarchy for overall linkage
18​ 3.2
Flows of linkage factors in the Innovation Triangle
19​ 3.3
Hierarchy for individual linkage judgment
22​ 3.4
Procedure for Linkage Judgments
24​ 4.1
The organizational structure of R&D in Vietnam prior to1988
28​ 4.2
The organizational structure of MoSTE
29​ 5.1
A partial sample of questionnaire
33​ 5.2
Data collection and processing steps
38​ 6.1
Percentage of response to preference order for different linkages
40​ 6.2
Percent of respondents giving first priority to various factors
41​ 6.3
Importance to factors by actors and overall group
42​ 6.4
Overall group synthesis of alternatives with respect to goal and factor
43​ 6.5
Hierarchy for Overall Linkage
44​ 6.6
Magnitude flow of factors from University to Industry
46​ 6.7
Magnitude flow of factors from Industry to University
47​ 6.8
Overall judgments on University and Industry linkage
47​ 6.9
Hierarchy for University and Industry linkage
49​ 6.10
Hierarchy for GRI and University Linkage
51​ 6.11
Magnitude flow of factors from University to GRI
53​ 6.12
Magnitude flow of factors from GRI to University
53​ 6.13
Overall judgments for University and GRI linkage
53​ 6.14
Magnitude flow of factors from GRI to Industry
55​ 6.15
Magnitude flow of factors from Industry to GRI
56​ 6.16
Overall judgments for GRI and Industry linkage
56​ 6.17
Hierarchy for GRI and Industry Linkage
58​