Tiến Sĩ Hướng dẫn học nói tiếng Anh trong các hoạt động chính khóa và ngoại khóa của sinh viên năm thứ nhất

Thảo luận trong 'THẠC SĨ - TIẾN SĨ' bắt đầu bởi Phí Lan Dương, 27/4/15.

  1. Phí Lan Dương

    Phí Lan Dương New Member
    Thành viên vàng

    Bài viết:
    18,524
    Được thích:
    18
    Điểm thành tích:
    0
    Xu:
    0Xu
    ABSTRACT
    This study was undertaken to determine the level of English language
    performance and the extent of participation of students in in-class and
    out-of-class activities of the freshman students in the Thai Nguyen
    University system to develop learning guide in speaking English both for
    in-class and out-of-class activities may be developed
    The respondents of the study were four hundred (400) students
    also from these universities who served as respondents.
    Specially, the study sought to answer the following questions:
    1. What is the level of English language performance of the
    students? 2. What is the extent of participation of students in in-class
    activities which require speaking in English? 2.1listening; 2.2speaking;
    2.3 reading and 2.4 writing? 3. To what extent do students’ engage in
    the following out-of-class activities?3.1. contests; 3.2 clubs; 3.3 sports;
    3.4 games and 3.5 entertainment? 4. Is there any significant difference
    between the extent of participation in in-class and that of out-of-class
    activities? 5. In which among in-class and out-of-class activities do
    teachers find communication barriers? 6. What learning guide in
    speaking English both for in in-class and out-of-class activities may be
    developed?
    In order to analyze the data gathered: Frequency count and
    percentage were used to describe the profile of the respondents such


    THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY
    Socialist Republic of Vietnam



    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    Republic of the Philippines


    iii
    as gender, age, colleges, cities they come from, and years they have
    learnt English. Weighted mean was used to determine the levels of
    language performance of the students. Regression Analysis was used
    to determine the communication barriers observed in in-class and out-
    of-class activities. Independent sample t-test was utilized the significant
    difference between the extent of participation of student in in-class
    activities and out – of – class activities.
    The following are the findings of the study:
    1. The level of English language performance of freshman students of
    Thai Nguyen University System was on the average only.
    2. The extent of participation of using English in in-class activities was
    high on reading and speaking.
    3. There was a moderate extent of participation on entertainment as a
    form of out-of-class activities.
    4. The performance of the students in using English in in-class activities
    is better than in out-of-class activities.
    5. Writing was deliberate as communication barriers in terms of in-class
    activities while joining clubs was noticed on out-of-class activities.
    6. A propose learning guide was formulated to enhance students
    English speaking.
    In light of the foregoing findings, the following recommendations are
    given:


    THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY
    Socialist Republic of Vietnam



    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    Republic of the Philippines


    iv
    1. The faculty may use verbal and non-verbal cues to encourage
    participation.
    2. English Lecturers may undergo training and must be equipped with
    modern teaching methodologies so as to increase the effectiveness of
    English language teaching.

    3. Students should be encouraged to watch and listen to English news
    like CNN, BBC, DD news etc and English serials/movies in TV/Radio so
    as to learn right pronunciation of various words and develop their
    listening skill.
    4. Students should be given enough practice to face interviews by
    conducting mock interviews in schools and colleges so as to build their
    confidence in spoken communication. Dramatization technique can be
    used to improve spoken English skill.
    5. Students should be encouraged to write letters to their friends in
    English. Motivate them to use complete English words to communicate
    using SMS by mobiles phones outside the college hours so as to
    improve written communication skill of the students.
    6. Government or the college Management committee should take
    necessary steps and keen interest towards above activities so as to
    develop communication skills of students in colleges.


    THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY
    Socialist Republic of Vietnam



    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    Republic of the Philippines


    v
    7. The management may form a system for “teacher-student” and
    “student-teacher” evaluation process for the improvement in
    achievement of the above objectives.
    8. Faculty may structure assignments that require students to illustrate
    how they are using class material in other areas of their lives, use active
    learning and other effective pedagogical strategies, hold students to
    high expectations, and indicate clearly what they must do to succeed
    academically.
    9. Faculty, administrators, and others must challenge students and each
    other to view learning as continuous and contagious in the biology lab,
    library, academic advisors' office, residence hall lounge, place of
    employment, student union, community service, and playing fields.
    10. The president of the university may periodically remind stakeholders
    about the value of out-of-class experiences and make decisions based
    on accurate information about students and their learning.






    THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY
    Socialist Republic of Vietnam



    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    Republic of the Philippines


    vi
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
    The writer extends her sincerest thanks and appreciations to those
    people who in one way or another have helped make this piece of work
    a reality.
    Dr. Dang Kim Vui, President of Thai Nguyen University, for
    establishing the international cooperation relationship between BSU and
    TNU.
    Dr. Hoang Bich Thao, Director for International Training Center,
    for his assistance and for supporting the researcher a chance to gain
    professional growth through completion of this study.
    The Panel of Examiners, for their honest and meaningful
    comments and recommendation to go on with this research work.
    Dr. Amada Banaag, her adviser and mentor, who drained all her
    effort and her best during the entire preparation and revision of this
    study.
    To the Rectors of the University, for his permission to conduct
    the research at Thai Nguyen Universities.
    To the students who served as her respondents for their
    assistance and collaboration in providing information necessary for the
    completion of the study.
    To her husband and her children, for inspiring her fulfill her
    dream.


    THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY
    Socialist Republic of Vietnam



    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    Republic of the Philippines


    vii
    To her ever dearest friends, and relatives who in one way or
    another, gave her encouragement and remarkable support.

    V.T.Q.H














    THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY
    Socialist Republic of Vietnam



    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    Republic of the Philippines


    viii



    DEDICATION
    With pride and honor,
    This piece of work is lovingly dedicated
    To her beloved parents, her loving husband
    and to her children

    V.T.Q.H






    THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY
    Socialist Republic of Vietnam



    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    Republic of the Philippines


    ix
    TABLE OF CONTENTS
    Page
    TITLE PAGE .
    APPROVAL SHEET . i
    ABSTRACT ii
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT . vi
    DEDICATION .vii
    TABLE OF CONTENTS .ix
    LIST OF TABLES xi
    LIST OF FIGURES .xiii
    CHAPTER
    I. THE PROBLEM .1
    Introduction 1
    Statement of the Problem 9
    Scope, Delimitation and Limitation .10
    Significance of the Study 11
    II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE, SYNTHESIS AND HYPOTHESIS
    .13
    Conceptual Literature .13
    Research Literature 41
    Synthesis 51
    Theoretical Framework .55
    Conceptual Framework 59


    THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY
    Socialist Republic of Vietnam



    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    Republic of the Philippines


    x
    Hypothesis of the study 62
    III. RESEARCH METHOD AND PROCEDURE .63
    Research Design 63
    Research Environment .64
    Subjects of the Study .65
    IV. PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF
    DATA .71
    V. SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND
    RECOMMENDATIONS .116
    Summary 116
    Conclusions 118
    Recommendations .118
    BIBLIOGRAPHY .121
    APPENDICES .135
    CURRICULUM VITAE 166



    THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY
    Socialist Republic of Vietnam



    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    Republic of the Philippines


    xi
    LIST OF TABLES

    Table Title Page
    1. Distribution of Samples by Colleges . 65
    2. Level of English Language Performance of the Students 72
    3. Extent of Participation of Students in In-Class Activities 76
    4. Extent of Participation of Students in In-Class Activities in
    Terms of Speaking . 80
    5. Extent of Participation of Students in In-Class Activities in
    Terms of Reading . 82
    6. Extent of Participation of Students in In-Class Activities in
    Terms of Writing . 84
    7. Summary Table on the Extent of Participation of Students in
    In-Class Activities . 86
    8. Extent of Participation of Students in Out – Of - Class
    Activities in Terms of Contests . 88
    9. Extent of Participation of Students in Out – Of - Class
    Activities in Terms of Clubs 88
    10. Extent of Participation of Students in Out-Class Activities in
    Terms of Sports 92
    11. Extent of Participation of Students in Out-Class Activities in
    Terms of Games . 95


    THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY
    Socialist Republic of Vietnam



    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    Republic of the Philippines


    xii
    12. Extent of Participation of Students in Out – Of -Class
    Activities in Terms of Entertainment . 98
    13. Extent of Participation of Students in Out-Of-Class Activities 101
    14. Difference Between the Extent of Participation in In-class and
    Out-of-class Activities . 104
    15. Coefficients on the Communication Barriers in In-Class
    Activities . 107
    16. Coefficients on the Communication Barriers in In-Class
    Activities . 109
    17. Learning Guides in Speaking English both for In-class and
    Out-of-class Activities . 111
     
Đang tải...