Thạc Sĩ An action research on the effects of pre - writing activities on the grade – 11 non – major english

Thảo luận trong 'Khảo Cổ Học' bắt đầu bởi Thúy Viết Bài, 5/12/13.

  1. Thúy Viết Bài

    Thành viên vàng

    Bài viết:
    198,891
    Được thích:
    167
    Điểm thành tích:
    0
    Xu:
    0Xu
    An Action research on the effects of
    Pre - writing activities on the Grade – 11 Non – Major English students’ motivation in writing at Nguyen Binh Khiem High School Hanoi

    nghiên cứu thực nghiệm về ảnh hưởng của các hoạt động trước khi viết tới việc tăng cường hứng thú trong kỹ năng viết cho học sinh lớp 11 không chuyên trường THPT Nguyễn Bỉnh Khiêm, Hà Nội





    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Page
    Acknowledgements i
    Abstract . ii
    Table of contents . iii
    Abbreviations . vi

    PART ONE: INTRODUCTION
    I. Rationale 1
    II. Research questions 1
    III. Methods of the study . 2
    III.1. Participants 2
    III.2. Instrumentation . 2
    IV. Research procedure . 3
    V. Scope of the study 4
    VI. Design of the study 4
    VII. Significance of the study 4

    PART TWO: DEVELOPMENT
    CHAPTER ONE: LITERATURE REVIEW
    I.1. ACTION RESEARCH
    I.1.1. What is action research? 5
    I.1.2. Why does a teacher need action research? 6
    I.1.3. How does a teacher carry out action research in a language classroom? 7
    I.1.4. Summary 8
    I.2. WRITING . 9
    I.2.1. What is writing? 9
    I.2.2. Why teach writing? . 9
    I.2.3. Approaches to teaching writing . 10
    I.2.3.1. Controlled – to – Free Approach . 10
    I.2.3.2. Free – Writing Approach . 10
    I.2.3.3. Paragraph – Pattern Approach 11
    I.2.3.4. The Grammar – Syntax – Organization Approach 11
    I.2.3.5. Communicative Approach . 11
    I.2.3.6. The Process Approach 11
    I.2.4. What is pre – writing? . 12
    I.3. PRE – LESSON FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE IN WRITING LESSONS 12
    I.3.1. Student factors . 12
    I.3.1.1. Students’ learning styles . 12
    I.3.1.2. Students’ motivation . 13
    I.3.1.3. Students’ language level . 13
    I.3.2. Teacher factors 14
    I.3.2.1. Teachers’ teaching methods . 14
    I.3.2.2. Teachers’ knowledge 15
    I.3.2.3. Teachers’ instructions 15
    I.3.3. External factors 16
    I.3.3.1. Time limitations 16
    I.3.3.2. Classroom and materials restraints . 16
    I.4. THE WRITING PROGRAM FOR GRADE 11[SUP]TH[/SUP] NON – ENGLISH MAJOR STUDENTS AT NGUYEN BINH KHIEM HIGH SCHOOL . 17
    I.4.1. The objectives of the program . 17
    I.4.2. The teaching materials . 18
    I.4.3. The schedule of the course 18

    CHAPTER TWO: ACTION RESEARCH PROCEDURE
    II.1. Pre – Improvement stage 20
    Step 1: Identifying the problem . 20
    II.1.1. Identifying the problem 20
    II.1.2. Observing a lesson that illustrated the problem . 20
    II.1.3. Conducting a survey to get information from students . 22
    Step 2: Finding causes of the problem 24
    II.1.4. Consulting with colleagues . 24
    II.1.5. Reading professional books or journals for ideas and suggestions . 28
    II.2. Try – out stage . 28
    Step 3: Designing strategies for improvement 28
    Step 4: Trying out strategies and making notes on what happened in the class 29
    II.3. Post – Improvement . 29
    Step 5: Evaluating the try – out . 29
    II.3.1. Post – improvement class observation 30
    II.3.2. Post – improvement questionnaire for students . 34
    II.4. Summary . 38

    PART THREE: CONCLUSION . 39
    I.Summary of the main findings . 39
    II. Implications for more effective writing lessons 39
    II.1. To the teachers 39
    II.2. To the classroom facilities . 40
    III. Limitations and suggestions for further study 40
    IV. Conclusion 40

    REFERENCES VII
    APPENDICES . IX
     

    Các file đính kèm:

Đang tải...